diff options
| author | Egor Tensin <Egor.Tensin@gmail.com> | 2021-04-09 01:08:21 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Egor Tensin <Egor.Tensin@gmail.com> | 2021-04-09 01:08:21 +0300 |
| commit | 0a201572d4b60ef6d18760f596e29876f7b78ef3 (patch) | |
| tree | 055f863581af3615c4df8c394917974b490371a1 /_posts | |
| parent | bump jekyll-theme (diff) | |
| download | blog-0a201572d4b60ef6d18760f596e29876f7b78ef3.tar.gz blog-0a201572d4b60ef6d18760f596e29876f7b78ef3.zip | |
bump jekyll-theme
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | _posts/2015-07-03-std-call-once-bug.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | _posts/2017-01-07-building-boost.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | _posts/2017-06-24-static-vs-inline-vs-unnamed-namespaces.md | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | _posts/2018-02-18-peculiar-indentation.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | _posts/2021-03-10-ubuntu-packaging.md | 2 |
5 files changed, 0 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/_posts/2015-07-03-std-call-once-bug.md b/_posts/2015-07-03-std-call-once-bug.md index 0aa0249..68983cf 100644 --- a/_posts/2015-07-03-std-call-once-bug.md +++ b/_posts/2015-07-03-std-call-once-bug.md @@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ excerpt: > Standard Library implementation shipped with Microsoft Visual Studio 2012/2013. category: C++ -custom_css: - - syntax.css --- I've recently come across a nasty standard library bug in the implementation shipped with Microsoft Visual Studio 2012/2013. diff --git a/_posts/2017-01-07-building-boost.md b/_posts/2017-01-07-building-boost.md index 052bb26..fa0bd3d 100644 --- a/_posts/2017-01-07-building-boost.md +++ b/_posts/2017-01-07-building-boost.md @@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ excerpt: > This post describes the process of building Boost on Windows using either Visual Studio or the combination of Cygwin + MinGW-w64. category: C++ -custom_css: - - syntax.css --- Below you can find the steps required to build Boost libraries on Windows. These steps tightly fit my typical workflow, which is to use Boost libraries in diff --git a/_posts/2017-06-24-static-vs-inline-vs-unnamed-namespaces.md b/_posts/2017-06-24-static-vs-inline-vs-unnamed-namespaces.md index 4cb0960..a5de5f1 100644 --- a/_posts/2017-06-24-static-vs-inline-vs-unnamed-namespaces.md +++ b/_posts/2017-06-24-static-vs-inline-vs-unnamed-namespaces.md @@ -4,9 +4,6 @@ excerpt: > Should I use `static`, `inline` or unnamed namespaces for function definitions? category: C++ -custom_css: - - snippets.css - - syntax.css snippets_root_directory: snippets/static_vs_inline_vs_unnamed_namespaces snippets_language: c++ snippets: diff --git a/_posts/2018-02-18-peculiar-indentation.md b/_posts/2018-02-18-peculiar-indentation.md index 7832194..9edebf9 100644 --- a/_posts/2018-02-18-peculiar-indentation.md +++ b/_posts/2018-02-18-peculiar-indentation.md @@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ excerpt: > An explanation for nasty `parse error`s I used to get for nested `do` blocks. category: Haskell -custom_css: - - syntax.css --- I've fallen into a Haskell indentation pitfall. I think it must be common, so I'm describing it here. diff --git a/_posts/2021-03-10-ubuntu-packaging.md b/_posts/2021-03-10-ubuntu-packaging.md index d55d292..10421f0 100644 --- a/_posts/2021-03-10-ubuntu-packaging.md +++ b/_posts/2021-03-10-ubuntu-packaging.md @@ -3,8 +3,6 @@ title: Basic Ubuntu packaging excerpt: > Packaging your software to be published in a PPA for the first time is a pain. -custom_css: - - snippets.css snippets_root_directory: snippets/ubuntu_packaging snippets_language: plain snippets: |