Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | |
---|---|---|---|
* | signal: remove the stupid add_to_event_loop wrapper | Egor Tensin | 2023-06-13 |
| | |||
* | signal: refactoring | Egor Tensin | 2023-06-13 |
| | |||
* | signal: remove unused APIs | Egor Tensin | 2023-06-13 |
| | |||
* | event_loop: hide the API details | Egor Tensin | 2023-06-13 |
| | |||
* | use signalfd to stop on SIGTERM | Egor Tensin | 2023-06-13 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Is this an overkill? I don't know. The thing is, correctly intercepting SIGTERM (also SIGINT, etc.) is incredibly tricky. For example, before this commit, my I/O loops in server.c and worker.c were inherently racy. This was immediately obvious if you tried to run the tests. The tests (especially the Valgrind flavour) would run a worker, wait until it prints a "Waiting for a new command" line, and try to kill it using SIGTERM. The problem is, the global_stop_flag check could have already been executed by the worker, and it would hang forever in recv(). The solution seems to be to use signalfd and select()/poll(). I've never used either before, but it seems to work well enough - at least the very same tests pass and don't hang now. | ||
* | signal: refactoring | Egor Tensin | 2023-05-15 |
| | |||
* | signal: refactoring, add comments in tcp_server, etc. | Egor Tensin | 2023-05-15 |
| | |||
* | use -std=c17 -Wpedantic | Egor Tensin | 2023-05-13 |
| | |||
* | get rid of __attribute__((constructor)) | Egor Tensin | 2023-05-06 |
| | | | | Explicit is better than implicit. | ||
* | add copyright notices | Egor Tensin | 2022-12-02 |
| | |||
* | don't use the latest glibc features | Egor Tensin | 2022-08-28 |
| | | | | | pthread_attr_setsigmask_np is only available since 2.32, which is too modern. | ||
* | make compilers happier | Egor Tensin | 2022-08-28 |
| | |||
* | worker: allow graceful shutdowns | Egor Tensin | 2022-08-26 |
Well, maybe "graceful" is a strong word, but now you _can_ do ./server & ./worker & ./client ci_run URL REV && kill "$( pidof worker )" and the worker will wait for the CI run to complete. |