diff options
author | Egor Tensin <Egor.Tensin@gmail.com> | 2020-01-27 02:59:02 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Egor Tensin <Egor.Tensin@gmail.com> | 2020-01-27 10:23:07 +0300 |
commit | 97a7f3373bbf85d7662e5d16aaaa6ace0a8caf2c (patch) | |
tree | 076e0151e9d11cb58cc53cd7a1dcf3250bfe189d | |
parent | add .dockerignore (diff) | |
download | fr24feed-97a7f3373bbf85d7662e5d16aaaa6ace0a8caf2c.tar.gz fr24feed-97a7f3373bbf85d7662e5d16aaaa6ace0a8caf2c.zip |
Travis: switch to make
-rw-r--r-- | .travis.yml | 60 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Makefile | 37 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | README.md | 46 |
3 files changed, 86 insertions, 57 deletions
diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml index 4cfdeb1..3259496 100644 --- a/.travis.yml +++ b/.travis.yml @@ -1,28 +1,3 @@ -# I used a guide to set up multiarch builds [1]. -# I don't understand it completely at the moment, but whatever. - -# The goal is to have a single multiarch repo on Docker Hub for each of the -# services. -# The approach is to use Docker's new BuildKit builder + the buildx command -# line plugin. -# -# Other possibilities are: -# * use QEMU + multiarch base images directly [2][3], and create a manifest -# file manually, -# * build natively on multiple architectures (not sure how to combine them in -# a single manifest then though). -# -# The disadvantages of the approach taken are: -# * newer Docker version is required, -# * docker-compose doesn't seem to support that method natively. -# -# [1]: https://mirailabs.io/blog/multiarch-docker-with-buildx/ -# [2]: https://lobradov.github.io/Building-docker-multiarch-images/ -# [3]: https://ownyourbits.com/2018/06/27/running-and-building-arm-docker-containers-in-x86/ - -# TODO: Docker Hub automated builds instead of Travis? -# TODO: docker-compose instead of docker buildx? - language: minimal os: linux dist: bionic @@ -33,26 +8,29 @@ services: addons: apt: update: true - # Newer docker for buildx support: + # Newer docker for BuildKit/buildx support: sources: - key_url: 'https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu/gpg' sourceline: 'deb https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu "$(lsb_release -cs)" stable' packages: - docker-ce -env: - # Enable experimental buildx support - DOCKER_CLI_EXPERIMENTAL: enabled - platforms: linux/i386,linux/amd64,linux/armhf +install: + # GCR & BuildKit don't work together, e.g.: + # https://github.com/moby/buildkit/issues/606 + - echo '{}' | sudo tee /etc/docker/daemon.json + - sudo systemctl restart docker -script: - - docker run --rm --privileged docker/binfmt:66f9012c56a8316f9244ffd7622d7c21c1f6f28d - - docker buildx create --use - - docker buildx build --platform "$platforms" dump1090/ - - docker buildx build --platform "$platforms" fr24feed/ - - |- - if [ "$TRAVIS_BRANCH" = master ]; then - echo "$DOCKER_PASSWORD" | docker login -u "$DOCKER_USERNAME" --password-stdin - docker buildx build --platform "$platforms" -t "$DOCKER_USERNAME/dump1090" --push dump1090/ - docker buildx build --platform "$platforms" -t "$DOCKER_USERNAME/fr24feed" --push fr24feed/ - fi +jobs: + include: + - name: Build and publish multi-arch images + script: |- + if [ "$TRAVIS_BRANCH" = master ]; then + make login && make builder/create && make push + else + make builder/create && make build + fi + - name: Build native images using Compose + script: sudo make install-compose && make compose-build + - name: Build native images using Docker + script: make docker-build @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +PROJECT = fr24feed # Use BuildKit, which is required: export DOCKER_BUILDKIT = 1 # Enable buildx support: @@ -6,7 +7,7 @@ export DOCKER_CLI_EXPERIMENTAL = enabled export COMPOSE_DOCKER_CLI_BUILD = 1 # Target platforms (used by buildx): platforms = linux/i386,linux/amd64,linux/armhf -# One of the latest (at the moment Compose versions) that supports BuildKit: +# One of the latest (at the moment) Compose versions that supports BuildKit: compose_version = 1.25.3 # Docker Hub credentials: DOCKER_USERNAME = egortensin @@ -26,19 +27,31 @@ install-compose: compose: install-compose -# Three kinds of builds: -# * docker build (for testing only), -# * docker-compose build (for testing only, Compose doesn't support buildx -# yet), -# * docker buildx (the right way for multiarch repos). +# Re-register binfmt_misc formats with the F flag (required i.e. on Bionic): +fix-binfmt: + docker run --rm --privileged docker/binfmt:66f9012c56a8316f9244ffd7622d7c21c1f6f28d + +binfmt: fix-binfmt + +# `docker build` has week support for multiarch repos (you need to use multiple +# Dockerfile's, create a manifest manually, etc.), so it's only here for +# testing purposes, and native builds. docker-build/%: docker build -t "$(DOCKER_USERNAME)/$*" "$*/" docker-build: docker-build/dump1090 docker-build/fr24feed +# `docker-compose build` has the same problems as `docker build`. compose-build: docker-compose build +# The simple way to build multiarch repos. +builder/create: fix-binfmt + docker buildx create --use --name "$(PROJECT)_builder" + +builder/rm: + docker buildx rm "$(PROJECT)_builder" + buildx/%: docker buildx build -t "$(DOCKER_USERNAME)/$*" --platform "$(platforms)" "$*/" @@ -47,19 +60,19 @@ buildx: buildx/dump1090 buildx/fr24feed # buildx is used by default. build: buildx -# Three kinds of pushes: -# * docker push (for testing only), -# * docker-compose push (for testing only, Compose doesn't support buildx and -# multiarch repos yet), -# * docker buildx --push (the right way for multiarch repos). +# `docker push` would replace the multiarch repo with a single image by default +# (you'd have to create a manifest and push it instead), so it's only here for +# testing purposes. docker-push/%: docker-build/% docker push "$(DOCKER_USERNAME)/$*" docker-push: docker-push/dump1090 docker-push/fr24feed +# `docker-compose push` has the same problems as `docker push`. compose-push: compose-build docker-compose push +# The simple way to push multiarch repos. buildx-push/%: docker buildx build -t "$(DOCKER_USERNAME)/$*" --platform "$(platforms)" --push "$*/" @@ -80,4 +93,4 @@ pull: clean: docker system prune --all --force --volumes -.PHONY: all login install-compose compose docker-build compose-build buildx build docker-push compose-push buildx-push push up down pull clean +.PHONY: all login install-compose compose fix-binfmt binfmt docker-build compose-build builder/create builder/rm buildx build docker-push compose-push buildx-push push up down pull clean @@ -32,18 +32,56 @@ the receiver in dump1090-fa's arguments (`--lat` and `--lon`). Start the containers using - docker-compose pull && docker-compose up -d + make pull && make up You can now access the interactive map at http://0.0.0.0:8080/dump1090-fa/ and the fr24feed web interface at http://0.0.0.0:8754/. Stop the containers using - docker-compose down -v + make down Development ----------- -Build the images using +TL;DR: build the native images using - docker-compose build --force-rm + make compose-build + +Or, if you have Compose version 1.24.x or below, + + make docker-build + +### Dependencies + +* Docker with BuildKit support (18.09 or higher), +* Compose with BuildKit support for `compose-build` (1.25.0 or higher). + +### CI + +I used a guide to set up multiarch builds ([1][1]). +I don't understand it completely at the moment, but whatever. + +The goal is to have a single multiarch repo on Docker Hub for each of the +services. +The approach is to use Docker's new BuildKit builder + the buildx command line +plugin. + +Other possibilities are: +* use QEMU + multiarch base images directly ([2][2], [3][3]), and create a manifest file +manually, +* build natively on multiple architectures (not sure how to combine them in a +single manifest then though). + +The disadvantages of the approach taken are: +* newer Docker version is required, +* docker-compose doesn't seem to support that method natively. + +[1]: https://mirailabs.io/blog/multiarch-docker-with-buildx/ +[2]: https://lobradov.github.io/Building-docker-multiarch-images/ +[3]: https://ownyourbits.com/2018/06/27/running-and-building-arm-docker-containers-in-x86/ + +### TODO + +* Docker Hub automated builds instead of Travis? +* docker-compose instead of docker buildx? |